Quick Service Portal; UX audit and redesign

A Business-Winning Proof of Concept for One of Nigeria's Largest Banks

Quick Service Portal; UX audit and redesign
Year:
2023
Status:
Done
Project type:
UX DesignUX Research
Objective:
To improve the user experience of an existing quick service portal for a commercial bank in Nigeria.
Role:
User Experience Designer
Stakeholders:
1 Product Manager, 3 Engineers, 1 Quality Assurance Specialist
Research Methods:
Usability TestA/B TestingInterviews
Tools:
Figma, Figjam, Maze
Duration:
4 weeks

The Client

Stanbic IBTC Bank is a private limited liability Investment banking and trust company established in 1989, offering over 2.4million clients a wide range of personal, business and commercial banking products through various branches spread across Nigeria and online banking platforms.

The Problem

There is currently an increase in bounce rate (78% as at May, 2023) and a decline in customer’s task completion rate (37% as at Aug, 2023). This has led to an increase in the physical presence of customers at the bank which isn’t really manageable and contradicts the essence of the quick and accessible service portal for filing complaints, making requests and giving feedback.

Pre-existing Quick Service Portal Design:

Pre-existing portal landing page
Pre-existing portal request forms

Defining The Scope

The bank organized a selective tendering, offering selected software technology companies an opportunity to pitch a workable and feasible solution to their business distress.

Requirement: As a proof of concept (POC), we were to work on any single preferred user journey.
We opted for the ‘Enterprise Online’ journeyHow can we simplify the journey for existing enterprise in registering for online banking?

Design Process

These are my watchwords when demystifying an experience issue or developing a product:

Usability, Usefulness, Delightfulness & Accessibility
Design process watchwords
Part 1 — Designing the Enterprise Online Sign Up Flow

Research & Findings

A stratified sampling technique based on such characteristics as age group, education level, account tier amongst others, was used to draft a set of about 1000 beta users.

Adopting the 5Ws and H technique (Who, What, Where, When, Why and How)

What is the problem?
Inability to successfully complete a task on the request portal.
Who experiences this problem?
Av. Age: 18 - 60 years,All genders95% Nigerians
Where does the problem occur?
The Quick Service Request PortalUsers spend 60% more time than normal on the landing page trying to find a path that best suit their requestJosephine, a visually impaired persona, complained that the color on the landing page causes eye strain and thus, causes her to drop off
When does the problem occur?
Round the clock
How are they currently working around it?
17% of visitors have migrated to a competitor’s bank30% of visitors eventually find a time within their busy schedule to visit the bank in person.37%, with frustration, manages to successfully scale through their flow
Why is this problem worth solving?
Will increase user retention and loyaltyImprove User satisfactionImprove business metricsReduce drop-off rate
What will success look like?
A 72% increase in task completion rate within the first 6 months of launch47% decrease in drop-off rate4.6/5.0 average experience rating50% reduction in request to directly speak to a bank officer or to meet in-person.

User Interview

We organized interviews and focus group sessions with a good number of our customers and these are our deductions of the most persistent feedback:

  • Users get overwhelmed with information overload as they land on the page
  • The use of colors needs to be minimal considering the large user base of different characteristics (E.g Josephine)
  • The need to fully automate the process:
User interview highlights

Automating the process

Following the image pasted above, most of the processes require users to download a form for each request, fill it manually and then re-upload to the portal. Not so efficient. We will be digitizing the whole process.

Problem Statement

Customers between ages 18-60, need a way to seamlessly perform a task (complaints, requests, and feedback), because they expect the platform to allow for easy usability as other competitor’s platform does and subsequently prevent the need to stress over in-bank transactions.

“How Might We” Statements

  • How might we automate the entire end-to-end flow of each task
  • How might we find a way to reduce information overload on each view on the portal
  • How might we consider the incorporation of accessibility enhancements

Ideation and Wireframing

Started off by re-defining the information architecture and content hierarchy

A new user need not see such options as ‘Upgrade’, ‘Dispense error report’ and many more. They haven’t even opened an account yet. Hence, we need a way for them to identify their user type to streamline the process and reduce the risk of being overwhelmed.

Redefined information architecture
Low fidelity wireframe
Low fidelity Wireframe
High fidelity landing page
High Fidelity Landing Page
Digitalized application process
Digitalized application process

Whoo-hoo!

… that was what I thought, until feedback started rolling innnnn! :{ It was actually great as it helped improve the product. Stay with me :)

Feedback (Stakeholders & Beta Users)

  • Stakeholders: We ought to have used any of the popular requests as the proof of concept e.g Acct upgrade, Debit card request etc.
  • The hero section shouldn't show a glimpse of the blog section. It's of less priority and increases the amount of time spent on the page as users try to make sense of all that's on the screen.
  • There's still a lot of colors on the page. and the gradient hover effect isn't pleasant to most users.
Feedback on the hero section

A subtext will be required to give users context to what each card does. Not all title are self explanatory.

Request cards with subtext

Progress tracker ought not be in the card and not scroll together with the whole page content. Users shouldn’t have to scroll to know where they are in the process.

Progress tracker feedback

Authentication screens aren’t user friendly. We should add some human touch.

Authentication screens feedback

Phew! We go again!

Part II — Account Upgrade Flow | Incorporation of First Iteration’s Feedback
Working session

I am the one smiling for reasons I can’t remember. Safe to say we found a way out of something :)

Second iteration

Request Cards (Accessibility in consideration)

Second iteration request cards
  • Subtext to aid better understanding of each request type
  • In a quest to have a minimalist and universally accepted design, I opted for a grey background color
  • … and a subtle shade of the primary color for hover indicator

Landing page - Hero section

Now, we have a simpler, cleaner and clearer design all contained in a view aimed at ensuring there isn’t any break in achieving their goal. Users can then choose to scroll down to see the blog section at their discretion.

Landing page hero section
NB: Icons and subtexts are dummy

User friendly Authentication Screens

User friendly authentication screens

Application Screens

Progress trackers are now fixed while other components scrolls

Application screens

Designing Delightful Experience

Homepage

Homepage

For security reasons, when a user login, we inform them of recent suspicious activities on their account and call to actions to take a step, either to report, stop the action or ignore the notice.

For easy findability, we added a search mechanism that works as an ajax search, sorting the page with card having title similar to the inputted query

Initiating an account upgrade process

Account upgrade process

We are aware that the documentations needed to upgrade one’s account may not be available at the time of application, hence, we catered for such use case where user can login to resume an existing application.

Debit card check

Debit card check

In the course of applying, just before previewing the inputted data for validation, the system checks if there’s an active debit card attached to the account. If there isn’t, a modal appears asking if they’d like to have a card and to select their most preferred pick-up branch. The bank should offer delivery in the nearest future.

Admin Portal

The different requests are received on the Admin’s end for approval or rejection with an integrated feedback mechanism via email to communicate applications’ status to the users.

Presentation & Testing Results

The stakeholders, engineers and Client gave very good feedback. They loved it! Here are some of the changes observed from our beta test over the course of 3 month post launch:88% increase in task completion rate28% drop-off rate4.7/5.0 average usability ratingUsers felt more in control of the platform and were delighted
Presentation and testing results
Presenting the proof of concept

What’s next?

  • Designing the other flows for each user types
  • Conducting adequate competitive analysis
  • Designing for Mobile: Majority of our users operate on their mobile devices. This project was aimed to validate and align on processes as its primary objective, hence, the desktop-first approach.
  • Testing, testing, testing and feedback

Reflections

Initially, we focused on ‘Enterprise Online’, a flow that seemed excellent but didn’t scale in value for users and business compared to other flows. For example, account upgrades were one of the most common request types. Prioritizing value to users is something I need to consider in future projects.

The power of collaboration cannot be over-emphasized

Feedback and iteration is a powerful tool all designers should continue to embrace on their journey up the ladder.

Super grateful to be a part of this project. Looking forward to what comes next.

Thank you for your reading through!

See next:Driving Finstack's profit growth by 40%